It’s still the stupidity, stupid!

Wow, just read this essay by David Michael Green. It is a frightening description of the big picture in the story of who we are and how we got here. Powerful writing.

If I were running for office, my slogan would be, “It’s the Stupidity, Stupid!”. It’s not the economy. It’s not drugs. It’s not women’s rights. It’s not religion. It’s stupidity that is so wide and shallow that it blankets the Earth, cutting off vital oxygen and nutrients needed for higher reasoning.
The essay linked above gives a quote by Eisenhower, describing the radical right as stupid. They might have once been, but they are no longer. They are mastering manipulation to fulfill their greed. They only have to elect a President once in a while and their gains are huge.
I cannot understand our paralysis in the face of these years of change since President Carter. To be fair, Obama did rally optimism, but now that has been quashed. We know from the past cycles that change will come, whether we believe in it or not. But, in the last Great cataclysm, a world war brought us out of economic depression. Now we already have three wars, but they are not Great enough to bring about full employment. Now one must wonder, in deep despair, whether we will get out of this one, and how many will suffer until we do.

Why is Obama smiling?

Obama announces a historic failure of the Democratic party to reach a budget deal with Republicans. Why is he smiling about it? He and Reid announce a “historic” “compromise”. A compromise is when you want something and your opponent want something, and you agree to give and take. When what you want is to NOT lose, it’s not a compromise, it’s a mugging. A mugger comes up to you and says “give me all your money!”. You reach a deal with the mugger to give him 50% of your money. You call that a compromise? You lost!

Who are the Democrats working for? Their behavior is difficult to explain. They should be asking for tax increases, more social support, single-payer health insurance, a real jobs program, help for the States and shutting down the wars! Then match Republican threats to shut down the federal government. THEN COMPROMISE by GIVING spending cuts on wars and GETTING a real jobs program, or some variation on this GIVE and GET.

Equilibrium

A simple physics concept, that systems tend to equilibrium. The natural state or outcome. A ball rolls down inside a bowl and oscillation back and forth while friction slows it, until it halts at the bottom, forces in balance.

Why don’t we humans reach equilibrium? We continue to grow, consuming, increasing our numbers. Can’t we choose balance? Pick our population and work only enough to sustain it? Apparently not.

A system out of balance, such as an explosion, changes rapidly during a phase before equilibrium because it is driven out by external forces. This forces act upon humanity to drive the population higher. We will reach equilibrium when the death rate matches the growth rate. This might be an equilibrium rife with poverty and misery. Probably not for all.

Right now, a quiet ologarchic coup is setting the stage for 500 Americans to enjoy pleasant lives while the middle class disappears. But, that’s another story.

Published with Blogger-droid v1.6.7

The world should work longer

60 Minutes story on the European 35-hour work week. End of the story is that they are deciding to be more like Americans, who work 60 hour weeks without extra pay. Which form of stupidity discounts the uniquely wonderful reality of life to embrace the fools who have done the most to degrade it? Don’t be fools! Enjoy life while working just enough to provide for needs. Don’t compete in the race to the bottom.

Published with Blogger-droid v1.6.7

New Politics

As I recall from my college political science class, politics is the legitimate exercise of the will of the people. As representative democracy in the United States has been hopelessly corrupted, we need new politics. What form shall that be? Direct democracy? Facebook polling? Pure plutocracy?

I propose that we add to interest groups which already exist, such as the Sierra Club, by formalizing further power in their hands through delegating voting from individual people to the organization. When an issue is under consideration, such as renewing the clean air act, a direct poll of people is undertaken. The collected votes are counted from people plus the delegated votes of representative organizations.

Perhaps plutocracy would continue to operate. And corruption. The test would be that the people’s will would overcome and out-vote those legitimized expressions of representative will.

Published with Blogger-droid v1.6.7

60 Minutes Assange Interview: News or Yellow Journalism?

Steve Croft’s interview of Julian Assange is full of barely veiled innuendo. Crofts acts as a self-appointed judge of Assange’s actions. This is not an unbiased interview. It is a low point for the quality of news reporting at CBS News. Faced with Assange’s defense of acting in the best tradition of American values, Crofts acts like surprised or simply ignores the challenge he himself invoked by accusation.

This is a good reflection of a increasingly common American persona, a simpleton unable to think critically about its own values and their relation to the world. Are we really to suspend our faith in freedom of speech and the value of whistle-blowers and civility simply because someone is embarrasingly exposing hypocrisy in the actions of our leaders?

Published with Blogger-droid v1.6.6

Cut Defense Budget to pre-9/11 Levels

I applaud the cooperation between Ron Paul and Barney Frank on cutting Defense spending. This article is old news, but I still want to point it out:



Why We Must Reduce Military Spending


Though I’m far from being a Tea Party activist, I’m glad to hear that many of them refuse to take Defense spending off the table when considering balancing the budget.

I call for the reduction of the Defense Budget to pre-9/11 levels! That represents about a 50% cut. That would be a tremendous benefit to balancing the budget and protecting our common welfare in the future.

Dear Mr. President

Here’s my message after the State of the Union (tried to send it via whitehouse.gov, but they give me a 404 error):

I cannot take anyone seriously when they discuss controlling the budget crisis and will not address Defense spending. I’m glad to hear mention of your support for proposed cuts in Defense. But, they are too small. Defense has DOUBLED since pre-9/11 times. Two wars. How can one try to balance the budget on the back of other domestic spending and let Defense be unrestrained.
This is the most important issue facing America. Choices made here are determining what America will be like in the future. We OUTSPEND the rest of the world on the military. This is not who we should be.
You have an opportunity to accept the Republican challenge and balance the budget by ending wars and wasteful military-industrial corporate welfare.